The Role of an Authorised Representative Under the EUDR

An Authorised Representative under the EUDR is an EU-based person or entity formally mandated by an operator or large trader to submit Due Diligence Statements (DDS) in the EU TRACES system on their behalf. Appointment is voluntary in most cases, the role is purely administrative, and full legal responsibility for compliance traceability, geolocation, risk assessment, mitigation, and record-keeping always stays with the operator.

Roughly 7,000 commodities and derivative products fall under the EUDR scope, and every shipment placed on the EU market must be backed by a Due Diligence Statement filed in TRACES. With enforcement now set for 30 December 2026 for large and medium operators and 30 June 2027 for small and micro operators, compliance teams are scrambling to figure out one specific question: do we appoint an Authorised Representative, or do we file the DDS ourselves?

It’s a fair question and the answer matters more than most teams realise. Get it right, and you delegate paperwork while keeping control. Get it wrong, and you create a false sense of security that collapses the moment a Member State competent authority asks for evidence.

What is an Authorised Representative Under the EUDR?

An Authorised Representative is any natural or legal person residing in the European Union who has been formally mandated, in writing, to submit a Due Diligence Statement on behalf of an EUDR operator or large trader through the EU’s TRACES Information System (EUDR Article 6(1)). Their role is narrow: they file DDS records. They do not perform due diligence, gather farm-level data, or carry legal liability for the products.

Think of an Authorised Representative as a notary, not a partner. They press the submit button. They don’t verify the substance of what’s being submitted. That distinction shows up in every Member State enforcement guideline and in the wording of Article 6 itself.

Where the Role Comes From in the EUDR Text

Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 gives operators and large traders the option to appoint an Authorised Representative. Article 6(3) creates a separate, narrower pathway: when the upstream party is a natural person or microenterprise, the next downstream operator must act as the AR if they want to place the products on the EU market a clause with significant implications for smallholder-sourced supply chains.

When Does Appointing an Authorised Representative Make Sense?

Appointing an AR makes sense when DDS submission becomes a bottleneck not when due diligence does. Three scenarios consistently come up across exporter conversations:

Scenario 1: Multi-Entity Corporate Groups

A multinational with separate legal entities across Germany, Spain, the Netherlands, and Italy can nominate its EU headquarters as the Authorised Representative for all subsidiary entities. Each operating entity still performs its own due diligence, but DDS submissions flow through a single AR account in TRACES. 

Example: A global cocoa processor with five EU manufacturing sites consolidates DDS filing into one Belgian holding company. The compliance team in Brussels submits on behalf of all five, while each site retains responsibility for its own traceability records.

Scenario 2: High-Volume DDS Submissions

Operators handling tens of thousands of shipments annually think coffee, palm oil, soy, and timber traders often outsource DDS submission to a specialised service provider. 

Example: An Indian coffee exporter shipping 4,000 lots a year into Hamburg and Antwerp may appoint an EU-based consultancy as its AR. The exporter still runs deforestation checks, geolocation validation, and supplier KYC. The AR handles only the TRACES workflow.

Scenario 3: Microenterprises and Natural Persons (Article 6(3))

This scenario is different from the first two. Under Article 6(3), if the operator is a natural person or microenterprise, they may mandate the next operator in the supply chain provided that next party is not also a natural person or microenterprise to submit the DDS for them. In effect, the downstream operator must act as AR if they want the products on the market. The microenterprise keeps legal responsibility and must supply the underlying data.

Explore the unique challenges smallholders face under EUDR, the role of buyers and cooperatives, and practical approaches for building inclusive and traceable supply chains. Read the full guide on EUDR for Smallholders →

What Can and Cannot an Authorised Representative Do?

Every EUDR engagement we have seen runs into the same misconception: that an Authorised Representative absorbs liability or accelerates compliance. Neither is true. The table below resolves the confusion in one place.

How Do You Formally Appoint an Authorised Representative?

Two steps. Both have to be done in this order, and both create an audit trail Member State competent authorities will look for.

Step 1: Register Both Parties in TRACES

The operator registers in the EU’s TRACES Information System under the role ‘EUDR Operator’ (or ‘EUDR Trader’, for large traders). The Authorised Representative separately registers under the role ‘EUDR Authorised Representative.’ Once linked, the AR can submit DDS records that remain attached to the operator’s account, not their own a deliberate design choice to keep accountability with the responsible party.

Step 2: Issue a Written Mandate

The mandate is a formal document that names the AR, defines the scope of authority (only DDS submission), and is signed by both parties. The EUDR does not prescribe a fixed template, but the mandate must be available on request from competent authorities and may need to be translated into the official EU language of the Member State where the DDS is submitted.

Several organisations publish free templates Preferred by Nature’s Due Diligence Toolkit being the most widely referenced. For Article 6(3) cases involving microenterprises or natural persons, a separate notification form is usually required.

Learn the step-by-step DDS filing process, understand the information required, and discover how organizations can streamline submissions while avoiding common compliance pitfalls. Read the full guide: How to File an EUDR Due Diligence Statement (DDS) →

When You Should Not Appoint an Authorised Representative

If the goal is to reduce legal exposure, an AR will not deliver. Article 6 makes the operator’s liability inseparable from the products placed on the market. We have seen three failure patterns:

• Liability misread — A trader assumes that handing DDS submission to a consultant transfers risk. The Member State authority disagrees. Fines, shipment seizures, and exclusion from public procurement still hit the operator.
• Data control loss — An AR with deeper access than necessary becomes a second copy of the operator’s supply chain data, raising commercial confidentiality and data protection issues.
• False simplicity — The operator treats DDS submission as the bottleneck, when the real constraint is upstream traceability. The AR submits faster, but the data they submit is still incomplete.

In all three cases, the AR is doing exactly what the regulation allows but the operator has built a strategy around the wrong constraint.

Where Does TraceX Fit in the AR Conversation?

An Authorised Representative submits whatever you give them. If your DDS is built on incomplete polygon data, missing land tenure documentation, or unverified supplier declarations, the AR submits the gap to TRACES and the liability still travels back to you.

TraceX exists to make sure the data the AR submits is defensible. Our Regulatory Compliance Platform generates DDS records automatically from primary supplier data, validates geolocation against the JRC and Hansen satellite datasets, and runs continuous risk scoring against deforestation alerts. The platform integrates directly with TRACES via API, so whether you submit yourself or through an AR, the workflow stays the same.

Practical example: Commodity exporters use TraceX to consolidate thousands of smallholder GPS plots, auto-extract KYC and land tenure from supplier emails using agentic AI, and export audit-ready DDS in PDF, XML, or TRACES-native formats. Whether their EU subsidiary acts as the AR, an external consultancy does, or they submit directly the underlying compliance evidence is identical.

Has the 2026 EUDR Amendment Changed the AR Rules?

No. The Authorised Representative provisions in Article 6 are unchanged by the November/December 2025 amendments. What changed: the application date moved to 30 December 2026 for large and medium operators and 30 June 2027 for small and micro operators. The European Commission’s May 2026 simplification review confirmed those dates will not slip again, and reaffirmed that authorised representatives including cooperatives acting on behalf of smallholders remain a valid pathway for DDS submission.

The takeaway: the deferred timeline is a preparation window, not a reprieve. Operators that wait until late 2026 to decide whether to appoint an AR will be deciding under deadline pressure. Operators that build their underlying due diligence system now can make the AR choice on its merits.

Explore what the EU Simplification Package includes, which regulations are affected, and what the proposed changes could mean for your sustainability and compliance strategies. Read the full guide on the EU Simplification Package →

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ’s)