Quick summary: EUDR risk assessment explained: the 11 Article 10 criteria, the low/standard/high country risk tiers, and how to mitigate non-negligible risk under Article 11 before you file the DDS.
An EUDR risk assessment is the stage of EU Deforestation Regulation due diligence where you decide whether a commodity carries a more-than-negligible risk of being linked to deforestation or illegal production. It weighs 11 criteria set out in Article 10 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1115, together with the country risk classification, and either clears the batch or triggers mitigation under Article 11 before a Due Diligence Statement (DDS) can be filed.
Updated September 2026. Reflects the December 2025 amendment (Regulation (EU) 2025/2650) and the 2026 simplification package. Application dates are confirmed: 30 December 2026 for large and medium operators, 30 June 2027 for micro and small enterprises. The 31 December 2020 deforestation cut-off is unchanged.
An EUDR risk assessment is the middle stage of the regulation’s three-part due diligence system, sitting between information gathering and risk mitigation. Its legal basis is Article 10 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1115. The question it answers is simple: is there a more-than-negligible risk that these commodities are linked to deforestation or illegal production? Its inputs are geolocation coordinates, the country risk classification, supplier data and the 11 criteria. Its output is a documented risk conclusion that either clears the product or triggers mitigation.
Looking for the step-by-step how-to? This page is the regulatory reference for the criteria and classification. For the operational workflow, satellite screening and software comparison, see our guide: how to run a deforestation risk assessment.
Liability follows the product, not just the producer, so the assessment applies more widely than many expect. You are in scope if you:
The deadlines are 30 December 2026 for large and medium operators and 30 June 2027 for micro and small enterprises, under the December 2025 amendment.

These are the specific factors you must weigh to decide whether risk is negligible. Run every commodity batch through all eleven and record the conclusion.
Learn what Article 10 requires, which risk criteria operators need to consider, and how to build a documented, audit-ready risk assessment process.
→ Read Our Guide: EUDR Article 10
Your workload scales with the Commission’s country benchmark. Each sourcing country is classified low, standard or high, which sets the depth of due diligence required.
| Country risk tier | What it signals | Due diligence required |
|---|---|---|
| Low | Low likelihood of deforestation-linked production | Simplified due diligence, but you must still confirm the tier and watch for mixing |
| Standard | Default where neither low nor high applies | Full due diligence: information, risk assessment and mitigation |
| High | Elevated deforestation prevalence or governance concerns | Full due diligence with enhanced scrutiny and a higher share of official checks |
Sourcing from a low-risk country does not by itself make you compliant: you still confirm the classification, verify the data and watch for the risk of mixing. See our guide to EUDR country risk classifications for detail.
Learn how EUDR country risk classification works, what the different risk levels mean, and how businesses can incorporate country risk into their broader due diligence process.
→ Read Our Guide: EUDR Country Risk Classification
These five steps map to what auditors expect to see documented. For the detailed operational how-to, including satellite screening and geolocation capture, follow the deforestation risk assessment hub.
If the assessment concludes the risk is more than negligible, you cannot place the product on the market until you mitigate it and a reassessment brings the residual risk down to negligible. Article 11 sets out this obligation. Negligible does not mean zero: it means risk has been assessed and mitigated to a defensible level you can show an auditor.
After mitigation, run the assessment again. Only a post-mitigation negligible conclusion clears the batch. Document every mitigation step and the reassessment, because that record is what an auditor will ask for. All documentation must be retained for at least five years.
Understand what EUDR Article 11 requires, which mitigation measures businesses can consider, and how to document actions taken to reduce identified risks.
→ Read Our Guide: EUDR Article 11
Most teams start in spreadsheets and hit a wall once geolocation volumes, supplier counts and audit demands grow. Here is how the two approaches compare for a buyer.
TraceX EUDR Solutions provide a staged, explainable risk-assessment workflow that evaluates supplier geolocations across satellite and Earth-observation datasets, assessing risk across five explicit dimensions. Its five-stage reasoning chain produces an auditor-defensible risk verdict for each plot, rather than relying on a single threshold-based flag. This is complemented by a Geometry Validator that performs approximately 13 automated integrity checks on every GeoJSON, with safe auto-correction where possible and rejection when geometry cannot be validated. Together, these capabilities help businesses move from fragmented geolocation data to validated, evidence-backed, plot-level EUDR risk assessment and audit readiness.
| Capability | Manual / spreadsheet | Risk assessment software |
|---|---|---|
| Geolocation data | Manual, hard to validate polygons | Automated capture, polygon validation |
| Scoring the 11 criteria | Subjective, inconsistent | Rules-based across all 11 criteria |
| Country tiers | Updated by hand | Auto-synced to the Commission benchmark |
| Audit trail | Fragmented, version chaos | Time-stamped, 5-year retention, export-ready |
| Scale | Breaks beyond a few suppliers | Built for thousands of plots and SKUs |
| DDS filing | Re-keyed manually | Generated and filed from one record |
Use this as a final pre-filing review for every batch:
Yes. For operators and non-SME traders placing covered commodities on, or exporting from, the EU market, the risk assessment is a required stage of due diligence under Article 10 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1115.
The 11 Article 10 factors: country classification, presence of forests, indigenous and local community rights, evidence of deforestation, prevalence of deforestation, source and reliability of data, country-of-origin concerns such as corruption, supply-chain complexity, risk of mixing, Commission expert-group conclusions, and complementary information such as certification.
Due diligence is the full three-part system: information collection, risk assessment and mitigation. The risk assessment is the middle stage that scores whether the risk of non-compliance is negligible.
Low-risk countries unlock simplified due diligence; standard and high-risk countries require full assessment and mitigation, and high-risk sourcing faces a higher share of official checks. You must still confirm the tier and watch for mixing even in low-risk countries.
Negligible risk means that, after assessment and any mitigation, the chance of non-compliance is insignificant and documented. It does not mean zero risk, but it requires a defensible, reproducible methodology.
You must apply mitigation under Article 11 (more data, audits, supplier engagement, monitoring), then reassess. Only a post-mitigation negligible conclusion allows the product onto the market.
Yes. Sourcing from a low-risk country unlocks simplified due diligence, but you must still confirm the classification, verify the data and watch for the risk of mixing with non-compliant product.
Software automates geolocation validation, criteria-based scoring, country-tier syncing, audit trails and DDS filing, removing the manual, error-prone parts. You retain accountability for the final conclusion.