Contact: +91 99725 24322 |
Menu
Menu
Quick summary: Discover how to address Scope 3 challenges in agriculture by managing land-based emissions. Learn about sustainable practices, technology solutions, and the importance of supply chain collaboration.
Land based emissions are a significant yet often overlooked part of agriculture’s carbon footprint. These emissions come from activities like deforestation, soil degradation, and land-use changes, which release large amounts of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide into the atmosphere. In today’s push for sustainable agriculture, tackling these emissions is no longer optional—it’s essential.
According to IPCC, Agriculture, forestry and other types of land use account for 23% of human greenhouse gas emissions. At the same time natural land processes absorb carbon dioxide equivalent to almost a third of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels and industry
Let’s take a closer look at land-based emissions, a critical component of Scope 3 emissions in agriculture. These are the indirect emissions tied to everything from converting forests to farmland to poor soil management. Addressing these emissions is key for agrifood companies striving to shrink their carbon footprint, align with sustainability goals, and meet growing demands for eco-friendly food production. In this blog, we’ll discuss the role of land-based emissions in agriculture, their impact on the environment, and practical ways companies can mitigate them through smarter land-use practices.
Key takeaways
When we talk about the carbon footprint of agriculture, we often think about fuel for tractors or energy use in food processing. But did you know that a significant chunk of emissions comes from the way we use and manage the land? These are called land-based emissions, and they play a huge role in agriculture’s environmental impact.
Land-based emissions are part of Scope 3 emissions—the indirect emissions that occur across an entire supply chain. In agriculture, these emissions primarily come from:
The agrifood sector has one of the largest carbon footprints globally, and land-based emissions make up a significant portion of this. Every step of the food journey—growing crops, raising livestock, and even converting forests to fields—can contribute to emissions.
Here’s why it’s important:
By addressing land-based emissions, agrifood businesses can take a big step toward creating a more sustainable future for both the planet and their bottom line.
Scope 3 emissions are generated both upstream and downstream within the value chain and lie outside the direct control of the reporting organization. In the agri-food sector, a substantial proportion of corporate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions fall under scope 3, primarily due to land-based emissions stemming from agricultural practices. For agri-input companies, these emissions can represent 67% of their corporate GHG inventory (scope 3 downstream), while for food companies, they may account for as much as 88% (scope 3 upstream). Consequently, tackling scope 3 emissions presents a significant opportunity to lower corporate GHG inventories. Since upstream and downstream entities contribute to on-farm emissions, this highlights the importance of collaboration throughout the value chain, involving both agri-input suppliers and food producers.
Definitions of Scopes 1, 2, and 3
Tackling scope 3 emissions can be particularly challenging (in contrast to scopes 1 and 2) since these emissions occur outside the direct influence of the reporting company.
The majority of emissions arise from agricultural practices and related land-use changes. This forms the scope 3 upstream for traders, manufacturers, processors, and retailers (scope 3, category 1) and scope 3 downstream for agricultural input suppliers (scope 3, category 11).
For companies downstream of the farm, scope 3 typically accounts for an average of 88% of emissions associated with sourcing agricultural raw materials. Conversely, an upstream firm like a nitrogen producer sees around 52% of its emissions in scope 3 from the usage of nitrate-based products in agricultural fields.
In this regard, scope 3 presents a considerable opportunity for reducing corporate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, agri-food businesses view it as one of the greatest challenges in establishing and achieving climate objectives.
Agri-input suppliers and the food value chain contribute to on-farm emissions, allowing companies to report a decrease in farm emissions as a reduction in their corporate GHG inventories. This creates a collective opportunity and supports the rationale for collaboration throughout the value chain in tackling land-based emissions, aiming to decarbonize the industry in alignment with the goals of the Paris Agreement. For farmers, land-based emissions fall under scope 1. Farmers lack incentives to adopt the same GHG accounting and target-setting strategies as corporations. Therefore, it is essential for companies to spearhead efforts in minimizing land-based emissions.
Reducing land-based emissions sounds great on paper, but when it comes to actually managing them, things can get tricky.
Imagine trying to measure emissions from hundreds, or even thousands, of farms across different regions, each with its own unique land type, farming methods, and environmental conditions. That’s the reality for most agrifood companies.
For example, emissions from a rice paddy in Asia look very different from those of a wheat farm in Europe. Add in variations in climate, soil types, and farming practices, and you can see why tracking land-based emissions across a global supply chain is a huge challenge.
Another hurdle is the lack of reliable data. Smallholder farmers, who make up a significant part of the global agricultural workforce, often don’t have the resources or technology to measure and report their emissions accurately.
Even when data is available, it’s not always consistent. Some farmers might use advanced tools to track their emissions, while others rely on manual estimates. This patchwork of reporting makes it hard for companies to get a clear picture of their overall emissions.
Addressing land-based emissions isn’t something a single company can do alone. It requires collaboration across the entire supply chain—farmers, landowners, suppliers, retailers, and even regulators.
But getting everyone on the same page can be tough. Farmers may resist adopting sustainable practices if they see them as costly or time-consuming. Meanwhile, retailers and regulators might push for changes without fully understanding the challenges on the ground.
The way we manage land plays a massive role in reducing emissions. By adopting sustainable practices, farmers can improve productivity while cutting down their carbon footprint.
A prominent agribusiness partnered with TraceX’s sustainability platform to transform its land restoration efforts through regenerative agriculture. By adopting innovative practices such as no-till farming, crop rotation, and soil health monitoring, the company significantly reduced land degradation and improved carbon sequestration. TraceX’s platform enabled real-time tracking of sustainability metrics, offering transparency and actionable insights across the supply chain. This initiative not only rejuvenated degraded lands but also demonstrated a scalable model for sustainable farming, aligning the agribusiness with global sustainability goals and setting a benchmark for the industry.
Land-use change, like clearing forests for agriculture, is one of the biggest contributors to land-based emissions. But this doesn’t have to be the case.
Technology is a game-changer when it comes to tackling emissions. With advanced tools, companies can measure, monitor, and verify sustainability efforts more effectively.
The TraceX dMRV (Digital Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification) platform is an advanced, blockchain-powered solution designed to track, measure, and report greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across agricultural supply chains with accuracy and transparency.
The Farm Management Platform complements the dMRV system by enabling farmers and agribusinesses to adopt sustainable practices that directly reduce on-farm emissions.
Addressing land-based emissions in agriculture is crucial for tackling Scope 3 challenges and achieving sustainability goals. By adopting regenerative practices, leveraging technology for traceability, and fostering collaboration across supply chains, the agrifood sector can significantly reduce its carbon footprint. These efforts not only comply with evolving regulations like EUDR but also create resilient and sustainable supply chains that benefit businesses, farmers, and the environment. The time to act is now—embracing these strategies will help secure a greener future for the planet and ensure long-term profitability for businesses.
Scope 3 emissions in agriculture refer to indirect emissions generated along the supply chain, such as from land-use changes, deforestation, fertilizer application, and transportation of goods.
Technologies like satellite monitoring, blockchain traceability platforms, and digital MRV tools enable real-time tracking of emissions, enhance supply chain transparency, and ensure compliance with sustainability regulations.
Land-based emissions significantly contribute to the agrifood sector’s carbon footprint. Managing these emissions is essential for meeting regulatory requirements, reducing environmental impact, and achieving net-zero goals.