Quick summary: Battery DPP compliance requirements explained: who must comply, the Annex XIII data set, and the 18 Feb 2027 deadline under the EU Battery Regulation.
Battery DPP compliance requirements are the data, access, and traceability obligations that every EV battery, light-means-of-transport (LMT) battery, and industrial battery above 2 kWh must satisfy under Article 77 of the EU Battery Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2023/1542) before it can be placed on the EU market from 18 February 2027. In practice, that means a machine-readable digital product passport, linked to each battery by a QR code, populated with the roughly 90 attributes set out in Annex XIII and kept accurate for the life of the battery.
Battery DPP compliance requirements are the obligation to attach a structured, machine-readable digital passport to each in-scope battery and keep its data complete, correct, and accessible.
A digital product passport (DPP) is a data record, not a PDF linked to the physical battery through a QR code and a unique identifier.
The battery passport is the first live application of the EU’s DPP concept, and the template later product categories (textiles, electronics) will follow.
The regulation is the law; the passport is the instrument it mandates. Conflating the two is the most common early mistake compliance teams make.
The pain most teams hit is definitional before it is operational. Battery DPP compliance requirements are not the same as your Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) registration, and they are not the same as your supply-chain due-diligence policy. Those are distinct instruments under the same regulation. The passport is specifically the Article 77 data record and getting its boundaries right up front saves weeks of mis-scoped effort when you start mapping obligations against your internal systems.
Preparing for the Battery Digital Product Passport?
Our complete guide to the Battery DPP explains what battery manufacturers and supply chain teams need to know from data requirements and traceability to QR codes, lifecycle information and compliance readiness.
Battery DPP compliance requirements split into three practical questions which batteries, by when, and whose responsibility. In short: three categories, one hard date, one responsible operator.
Under Article 77(1), the passport applies to each LMT battery, each industrial battery with a capacity above 2 kWh, and each EV battery placed on the market or put into service. Portable batteries, SLI (starting, lighting, ignition) batteries, and industrial batteries at or below 2 kWh are outside the passport requirement a distinction worth checking at the individual-battery level, not the system level, because many stationary-storage and UPS systems cross the 2 kWh threshold per battery.
Is your business prepared for the EU Battery Regulation?
Our guide to the EU Battery Regulation breaks down the key requirements businesses need to understand, from battery sustainability and carbon footprint to due diligence, recycled content, traceability, labelling and the Battery Digital Product Passport.
Meeting battery DPP compliance requirements becomes mandatory on 18 February 2027. Because Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 is directly applicable, there is no member-state transposition to soften or delay it. For manufacturers and importers, 2026 is the data-readiness year: lifecycle data collection, QR/data-carrier workflows, and supplier integration all have to be in place before the passport can be generated and registered.
The economic operator placing the battery on the EU market the manufacturer or, for imported batteries, the importer is responsible for ensuring the passport exists, is linked to the battery, and stays accurate and up to date. That operator may authorise another party in writing to act on its behalf, but the accountability does not move. When a battery is repurposed or given a second life, the operator placing it back on the market must generate a new passport linked to the original.
The hardest part of battery DPP compliance requirements is the data itself. Annex XIII defines the mandatory content the Battery Pass Consortium counts roughly 90 attributes for EV batteries organised into seven lifecycle clusters:
Two structural distinctions shape how you store and update this data. First, static attributes (carbon footprint, sourcing) are set at market entry and rarely change, while dynamic attributes (state of health, cycle count) evolve across the battery’s life and must be kept current. Second, some data is model-level and some is unit-level. On top of that, access is tiered: some fields are public, some visible only to parties with a legitimate interest and the Commission, and some restricted to notified bodies and market-surveillance authorities. Getting these distinctions right is what separates battery DPP compliance requirements that survive an audit from a static form that does not.
Preparing for the EU’s Digital Product Passport requirements under ESPR?
Our guide to DPP for ESPR explains how the Digital Product Passport is shaping product transparency, sustainability and circularity across EU supply chains from product data and traceability to recyclability, repairability and compliance information.
On paper, a passport looks like a form to fill in. In practice, battery DPP compliance requirements are a retrieval problem, not a documentation problem and that is where manual systems fail.
The data does not live in one place. Carbon-footprint figures come from LCA models, recycled-content percentages from cell and material suppliers, due-diligence evidence from procurement, and state-of-health telemetry from the field. A spreadsheet can hold a snapshot, but it cannot keep ~90 attributes per battery model reconciled across suppliers, versioned for audit, and updated as dynamic fields change at the volume a real product line generates. This is the same reason the “one data layer, many regulations” approach wins: the carbon, sourcing, and material data you assemble for the battery passport is the same data your EPR, due-diligence, and CSRD reporting draw on. Capturing it once, in a structured system, is the difference between passing an audit and scrambling for it.
Battery DPP compliance requirements are not a labelling task bolted on at the end of a production line they are a data-architecture decision made at the start. The TraceX platform is built to capture supply-chain, material, carbon, and lifecycle data in a single traceable layer, so the Annex XIII attributes needed for the battery passport are a query against data you already hold rather than a fresh scramble per SKU.
The organisations that will clear the 18 February 2027 deadline comfortably are the ones treating 2026 as a data-readiness year mapping every Annex XIII field to a source system now, while there is still time to fix the gaps.
TraceX Battery DPP Solutions helps battery manufacturers prepare for Battery Digital Product Passport (DPP) compliance by creating a connected digital record of the battery’s lifecycle and supply chain. It brings together supplier information, raw-material provenance, component data, manufacturing events, batch and serial-level traceability, carbon footprint, recycled content and sustainability data in one structured workflow. TraceX can also connect data from existing enterprise systems and support supplier data collection, validation and audit-ready reporting. This helps manufacturers move from fragmented spreadsheets and disconnected systems to a verifiable, DPP-ready data foundation that can support the information required throughout the battery lifecycle from raw materials and manufacturing to use, reuse and recycling.
The same battery DPP compliance requirements can be met two ways. The gap shows up under audit and at scale.
| Requirement | Manual / spreadsheet approach | TraceX platform approach [pending sign-off] |
|---|---|---|
| Annex XIII data capture | Re-keyed per SKU from scattered supplier emails and PDFs. | Structured capture into one traceable data layer, reused across regulations. |
| Dynamic data (state of health, cycle count) | Static snapshot; goes stale after market entry. | Field/telemetry updates flow into the unit-level record over the battery’s life. |
| Supplier evidence | Chased ad hoc; hard to verify or version. | Requested, collected, and version-controlled against each attribute. |
| QR + unique identifier | Generated manually, linkage error-prone. | Identifier and QR issued and linked to the passport record automatically. |
| Audit & market surveillance | Retrieval scramble across files and inboxes. | Tiered-access record produced on demand for the right authority. |

Use this to evaluate any passport solution against real battery DPP compliance requirements not just a QR generator:
They are the obligation, under Article 77 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542, to attach a machine-readable digital product passport populated with the Annex XIII data set and linked by QR code to each in-scope battery before it is placed on the EU market from 18 February 2027.
18 February 2027. The date is directly applicable across all 27 EU member states, so there is no national grace period.
EV batteries, LMT batteries, and industrial batteries with a capacity above 2 kWh. Portable, SLI, and sub-2 kWh industrial batteries are outside the passport requirement but remain subject to other Battery Regulation obligations.
The economic operator placing the battery on the EU market the manufacturer or the importer. That operator may authorise another party in writing to act for it, but the accountability stays with the operator.
The Annex XIII data set roughly 90 mandatory attributes across seven clusters: general/manufacturer information, compliance and certifications, carbon footprint, due diligence, materials and composition, circularity, and performance and durability.
No. They are distinct instruments under the same regulation. EPR registration and the supply-chain due-diligence policy are separate obligations from the Article 77 passport, even though they draw on overlapping data.
For a handful of models, briefly. At production volume it fails on auditability, dynamic-data updates, and supplier reconciliation which is why manufacturers move to a structured traceability platform ahead of the deadline.